Itron Smart Meter Dangers

Posted on  by admin

Recently, I had the opportunity to measure the RF Radiation coming from an ITRON C1SR in Summerland BC and the results were quite alarming. This is an AMR type of meter. This type of meter has been reported to being used in Nelson and Grand Forks BC. This C1SR meter transmits a spike of radiation that contains the current kWh reading of the meter every 30 seconds. This is done so that a Meter Reader with a receiver can drive by any time and can get the reading without having to wait very long. This time between transmits may be changed by the operator but they have to walk up to the meter and use a direct connection to the meter to do that. It seems that the meters in Grand Forks are also transmitting at 30 second intervals. The measurements that I made from the front of the meter in Summerland at a distance of 2 meters ranged from 500 to almost 900 microwatts per square meter ( µW/m²).

This, is quite high when measured at 2m. The radiation at 1m would be significantly higher. If this meter were on the side of a house next to a bedroom or kitchen then I would be very concerned. I used a GigaHertz HF59B radiation meter and recorded the output on a GigaHertz NFA1000.

Here is what I recorded:. You can see that all spikes were not the same power (I do not know why) but the spacing was almost exactly 30 seconds. I have also recorded the output of Itron Smart Meters and found that the radiation spikes were similar in strength (amplitude) but the number of spikes were significantly less than the C1SR meters.

Thus, if you believe that each spike from a digital meter is harmful and the radiation damage is cumulative, then you must conclude that the Itron C1SR and similar AMR meters are capable of serious health impact similar to that of Smart Meters. 1) Jerry Flynn shares a letter he has written to Dr. Paul Hasselback, Vancouver Island Health Officer, about the lack of training given to doctors about EHS. In fact, few are given any training about any health effects caused by RF exposure.

Until recently, no medical school provided any such classes, but there is one at the University of Alberta Med School, taught by Dr. Stephen Genuis. This leaves most of the new physicians, and very few of older doctors, to never learn anything about the RF issue. It has been left to us to try to educate our doctors.

It is the College of Physicians and Surgeons, as far as I know, that is supposed to provide clinics and information to help keep the doctors up to date on topics, treatment, etc. Why aren’t they providing opportunities to educate doctors about EHS and RF-related health problems? I doubt that the College would listen to non-doctors, but it might get their attention if they received info about what is going on, what the science is, and what doctors don’t know.

They can be contacted via an online form at:. 2) It is difficult to understand how the Federal Minister of Health, or our provincial authorities, can say there is no evidence of harmful effects when there are nearly 24,000 peer reviewed studies summarized on one website.

There have been studies done by various governments since the 1950s when military personnel suffered “radiation sickness” after working with radar, etc. The only reasonable assumption we can make is that the industry’s tentacles are too strong and reach too far into the agencies that are supposed to protect us. The EMF-Portal is an extensive literature database with an inventory of 23,675 publications and 5,823 summaries of individual peer reviewed scientific studies on the effects of electromagnetic fields.

Dangers of Smart Meters: Know the Truth

How much more evidence do we need when School Officials, Health Officers and Government Officials are unable to provide parents with ONE STUDY that says microwave radiation exposure is safe for children and the unborn? 3) Apparently, Ottawa (Measurements Canada) has been given approval for “poverty meters” – meters where people feed them like parking meters and when the time is used up, so is the power. This is the first I’ve heard of it, but apparently there is a chance (just a couple of weeks) for some comments.

What Can I Do about Electropollution?

A member in Ontario sent this to me. I hope you will provide comments because this would open the door for this sort of metering to be in BC for those who might be considered credit risks. (1) I think this is the consultation Gallant referred to: https://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/mc-mc.nsf/eng/h_lm00012.html. Maybe this is part of the background (I don’t know): https://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/mc-mc.nsf/eng/lm00062.html. (2) And here’s a consultation period that just ended Sept 30, 2016: https://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/mc-mc.nsf/eng/lm04805.html.

Smart Meter Dangers FAQs

Introduction of mandatory reporting of electricity and natural gas meter populations and meter inspection data. This should be no surprise to Ontario residents who are all too familiar with the close political party relationship between Ottawa and Toronto. Federal Agency Measurement Canada is preparing to finalize approval for “pre-pay” hydro meters. This was only a matter of time since the province installed so-called “smart meters” in people’s homes.

What I predicted before the last election is now happening. I predicted that all Canadian taxpayers would end up with part of the bill for Ontario Liberals’ policy disasters. It was predictable because the same policy advisers in Queen’s Park, who wrote the “Greed” Energy Act and fled Toronto, are now hiding in Ottawa as the most senior advisers of the federal Liberal Party.

  • The cozy relationship between the Prime Minister and the Ontario Premier is bad for all taxpayers, just as I warned Canadians before the last election.

  • To picture a pre-payment electricity meter, just think of a parking meter that you load with money in order to park a vehicle.

  • These are popular in third-world countries, particularly where poor people have no access to credit. They enable the power utilities to deny access to a basic necessity without actually having to pull the plug if customers have trouble with bills.

It forces the poor household to self-disconnect. Canadians still have an opportunity to share their opinion on poverty meters. While the federal government has set a January 1st 2017 implementation date for its new policy, you are invited to provide me your thoughts on pre-payment electricity meters.

Remember, ‘no comment’ is considered by this government to be a “yes.”. 4) A retired member is seeking accommodation on Vancouver Island. He is sensitive, environmentally responsible. If you have something available, please email him at: [email protected]

5) An Electrical Engineer is a licensed professional whose actions are governed by a code – that they must advise when they find something that is dangerous. An Electrical Engineer in Michigan has reported on the dangers of the ITRON meter being considered in Michigan.

He has found causes for health issues – thousands of short signals and dirty electricity – and causes for fires.

There are other Electrical Engineers who have identified many other design flaws. Hopefully, they will speak out so that we can charge BC Hydro and this government with harmful negligence or reckless endangerment.

“It actually sends an RF pulse about every 4-5 seconds constantly and a longer duration RF emission after midnight running about 3-5 minutes. There is no need for the AMI meter to send a pulse every 4-5 seconds all day just to synchronize and time stamp the clock inside the meter, the meter only needs to send data once a day for 3-5 minutes.

All these pulse transmissions the AMI meter is doing is a complete waste of energy and because it is a short but frequently pulsing signal that is not needed to measure power consumption, it is creating needless health effects and is impacting consumers as evidenced in the testimony.

  • Some consumers have been affected to the point of near death experiences.

  • The Mesh Network design is saturating the environment with RF transmissions mostly for the purpose of the network synchronization not the consumption measurement of power.

  • I could not think of a worse network design for a power measurement device.”.

  • [- https://stopsmartmetersbc.com/texas-lawsuit-union-sues-oncor-electric-concerning-safety-of-smart-meters/– https://stopsmartmetersbc.com/?s=itron– http://emrabc.ca/?s=itron].

From: Jerry FlynnSent: October 12, 2016To:[email protected] Subject: Corruption! Health Canada, the WHO and ICNIRP are NOT protecting Canadians from ‘pulsed’ N0N-thermal RF radiation! Tragically, the only hospital in Canada where doctors are specially trained to diagnose and treat patients with electro-hypersensitivity (“EHS”) is the Women’s College Hospital in Toronto.http://www.earthcalm.com/hospital-recognizes-electromagnetic-sensitivity.

This whole electro-magnetic radiation (EMR) or, as it is better known, Electric-Magnetic Field (“EMF”) issue, is linked by NON-industry scientists around the world to virtually all of today’s ‘modern’ diseases and epidemics, e.g., leukemia, many other forms of cancer, autism, ADHD, Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s ALS, etc.

Yet, because North America’s mainstream media has seen fit to remain silent on this whole issue for the past 50 years, today’s physicians remain largely unware of EMFs (or EHS), which now literally threaten the health and well-being of every person – and living thing – on planet earth!

The following was sent to the key Government of Canada officials.

Hopefully, you will see fit to share this with other Health Authorities in BC.

It is the truth!

Sincerely,Jerry Flynn (full contact details are below).

—–Original Message—–.

Subject: Corruption!

Health Canada, the WHO and ICNIRP are NOT protecting Canadians from ‘pulsed’ N0N-thermal RF radiation!

When will the Government of Canada stop today’s worst-ever case of corruption, which is also the most harmful ever – not just to people, but to all living things?

Beginning in the late 1970s, the corruption today is pandemic and involves Health Canada’s ‘Radiation Protection Bureau’, their colleagues in Industry Canada, the R.

Samuel McLaughlin Research Centre, the WHO (World Health Organization), ICNIRP (the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection) and the US-Military dominated ICES (International Committee on Electromagnetic Safety) – none of whom is protecting – or ever has protected – Canadians from man-made “low-level pulsed, NON-thermal Radio Frequency radiation” or Extremely Low Frequency (or Powerline 60 Hz) radiation.

Scientists around the world say this is now a global crisis!

When will the Government of Canada direct the RCMP to conduct a thorough and comprehensive national criminal investigation of this, what truly is, an outrageous ‘crime against humanity’?

In the interim, I respectfully urge the Minister of Health to impose the “Precautionary Principle” on:.

1) all wireless radio products/devices – including baby monitors and ‘smart’ meters; and,.

2) on all new or proposed Extremely Low Frequency (or Powerline 6 Hz alternating current) electrical apparatus, devices, installations etc.

The attachment contains more than ample evidence to support all that is said above.

Sincerely,James Gerald (“Jerry”) Flynn, Captain (retired).

[read attachment October 10, 2016 No One is Protecting Canadians From Man-Made Radiation!

:– https://stopsmartmetersbc.com/z/2016-10-12-fed-health-minister-says-no-scientific-evidence-that-rf-is-harmful/ under Letters].

Sharon NobleDirector, Coalition to Stop Smart Meters.

“Cell phones will probably increase many neurological diseases and brain tumors over the next 10 to 20 years.” ~ Dr.

Neil Cherry – Professor of Environmental Health Lincoln University, New Zealand.

Print Page •Free eBook: 35 Gut Recovery Recipes.

Smart sounds good, doesn’t it?

We have smartphones that rarely leave our hands and smart meters on our homes sending data to our utility companies.

We have smart speakers that are always listening, which can play music on command or place a delivery order for dinner.

We are surrounded by brilliant technology that makes our lives easier.

These devices may be smart, however, how smart are we to use them?

They communicate constantly through electromagnetic fields and radiofrequency waves that flow all around us.

However, just like you want to drink clean water, breathe clean air, eat organic food and use clean body products, you’ll also want to secure a clean “electronic” environment too.

Let’s take a closer look at what a smart meter actually is and what the experts are saying.

Then you can decide if you should be concerned about smart meter dangers and how they affect your health.

1.What is a Smart Meter? 6.How Can I Make a Difference? 7.Smart Meter Dangers FAQs. We know about smartphones and other household conveniences, yet what is a smart meter, and should you be concerned about smart meter dangers? Most of us use electricity provided by an electric co-op or utility, and we have a meter on our home that measures usage.

Traditionally, this is an analog meter that’s read monthly or bimonthly by an employee of the utility company. The smart meter, also called an Advanced Meter Installation (AMI), is a two-way device used by utility companies to measure energy usage in your home. It’s mounted on the outside of your home like a traditional meter and is more common in newer homes. No one has to come to read your meter because the meter sends data about your usage to the electric company.

It does this quite frequently. As often as every 15 minutes, in fact. They use radiofrequency (RF) waves, a form of electromagnetic energy, to transmit energy consumption data to a central computer at the utility company.

These RF waves move through space at the speed of light. The transmissions are sent using a method of communication based on either a cell phone, pager, satellite, radio, power line (PLC), WiFi or Internet (TCP/IP).

Utility companies first started using smart meters in Europe and now the practice has spread to the US. In fact, more than 43 million smart meters have been installed in homes and businesses in the US alone since 2012.1 This number is quickly rising thanks in large part to our government’s Smart Grid investment of $3.4 billion in 2009. A further 115 million smart meter deployments are projected by the end of 2021, meaning more than 75% of American homes will be exposed to smart meter dangers.2.

Those of you who are familiar with my work as a functional medicine physician know that I always advocate that we can take back control of our health.

This includes informing ourselves as best we can about smart meter dangers. I want to ensure you are aware of the information available on smart meter dangers.

This way you can make informed decisions regarding your home environment, as I have recently done. One fact that cannot be ignored is that smart meters emit electromagnetic radiation (EMR) in the form of radiofrequency radiation, which is a byproduct of radiofrequency waves.

No one disclaims this as one of the largest smart meter dangers. RF radiation was classified in 2011 by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), as “possibly carcinogenic (cancer-causing) to humans.” Furthermore, there is no data that shows RF radiation is safe. In fact, no one has conducted health studies on humans living in homes with smart meters.

The World Health Organization is planning a formal assessment of the health effects from RF exposure, however, this report is not yet available. People with smart meters in their homes have reported a sudden increase in dizziness, ear pain, memory problems, heart palpitations, anxiety, and sleep problems.

We do know that exposure to large amounts of RF radiation as a result of accidents involving radar has caused severe burns.

Whether in large or small amounts, RF radiation has adverse effects on your health.

The US safety limit for RF radiation is 1,000 micro-watts per meter squared.

However, it’s not uncommon for some smart meters to produce up to 60 times this amount.

That means the radiation from smart meters is equivalent to the output of 160 wireless devices such as cell phones.

And smart meters are continuously transmitting data and producing RF radiation in and around your home.

The amount of RF energy exposure depends on how far the smart meter mounted on a building is from the smart meter antenna.

However, there are simple ways you can protect yourself and your family from smart meter dangers.

I’ll explain these after I talk about something called dirty electricity, which you can definitely clean up in your household.

Most of our wireless devices and electronics are powered by direct current (DC) at about 12 volts.

However, our modern electrical circuits use alternating current (AC) at 120 or 240 volts.

Our electronic devices have to convert the AC power to DC power.

This conversion creates dirty electricity in the form of erratic electromagnetic interference (EMI) which is also a type of ionizing radiation such as RF. This dirty electricity travels through your home’s electrical system and radiates into the environment through outlets, power strips, wireless devices, and electronics, polluting your environment with “electropollution.”3 Smart meters exacerbate this problem by contributing significantly to the levels of dirty electricity in a home.

This is due to the repeated spikes and surges of higher frequencies of electricity that run throughout every circuit of a home with a smart meter.

Electropollution can travel through the air at a high frequency, contaminating every room in your house.

However, the good news is that just as we would filter our air, we can filter out electropollution and protect ourselves from smart meter dangers.

Smart Meter Electropollution can trigger Autoimmune Symptoms – Infographic – Amy Myers MD®Dr.

Amy MyersJanuary 12th, 2020https://www.amymyersmd.com/article/dangerous-smart-meter/Smart Meter Electropollution can trigger Autoimmune Symptoms – Infographic – Amy Myers MD®.

If you ask your utility company if a smart meter impacts your health, you’ll likely be told there is no health risk.

We do not live in a perfect world, however, and the evidence behind smart meter dangers shows quite the opposite.

More and more scientific evidence — not mere speculation — links dirty electricity to a vast array of physical, emotional, and cognitive health problems.

According to the BioInitiative Working Group, more than 6,000 studies show the correlation of electromagnetic energy with harmful effects, chronic conditions, and disease.4.

There is also evidence that electropollution triggers an immune system response.

That’s because the body thinks the electrical fields are foreign invaders similar to bacteria and viruses.

As I’ve seen with thousands of patients in my functional medicine clinic, chronic inflammation leads to fatigue, cognitive problems, brain fog, irritability, anxiety, and memory loss.

It is the root cause of autoimmune disease.

In fact, chronic electrical exposure triggers symptoms that mirror those experienced in dozens of autoimmune diseases.5.

According to David O. Carpenter, MD, radiofrequency exposure at elevated levels for a long period of time increases the risk of cancer, damages the nervous system, and causes sensitivity. It also has adverse health effects on the reproductive system and other organ systems. In addition, it elevates the levels of peroxynitrite (a toxin made by your body), which is linked with over 60 chronic diseases.

According to the World Health Organization, tissue heating is the principal mechanism of interaction between radiofrequency energy and the human body. Sam Milham, MD has spent nearly thirty years researching the impact of electric and magnetic fields (EMFs). He links dirty electricity to cancer, heart disease, diabetes, Alzheimer’s, and suicide. He also connects it with neurological disorders such as multiple sclerosis and Lou Gehrig’s disease. So far, Austria is the only country with a written suggestion for guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of EMF-related health problems.

Globally, we have not yet conclusively solved — or even adequately studied — smart meter dangers. However, you can take control of your own health by cleaning up the electropollution in your home. Let me tell you how. You can easily do a few simple things that will clean up your environment and reduce your exposure to radiation from smart meters. I can assure you they’re pretty quick and easy because I’ve done them myself.

Wondering how to block smart meter radiation? First, call your utility company to find out if you have a smart meter.

Some states have an “opt out” program that will allow you to use a traditional meter for an additional fee each month.

I recommend you have your smart meter removed if you have one and replaced with a traditional meter if you can.

This is what I did after learning more about smart meter dangers.

If you cannot opt-out of having a smart meter, install a lining or RF blocking paint inside your home.

You can also install a smart meter guard, which is a cover you can place over your smart meter.

It’s made of a conductive metal mesh screen that will block 90% to 95% of the RF radiation emitted from the smart meter.

They are highly effective, not very expensive, and are very easy to install.

There are plenty of ways to eliminate much of the “dirty electricity” in your home, however the easiest step is to unplug items you aren’t actively using.

Simply turning items off isn’t always enough as many small appliances continue to draw power from the grid even when they’re not on.

First, you can help mobilize citizens to make a difference in a few ways.

Start informing your neighbors about smart meter dangers, and let them know that smart meters aren’t a must-have.

They’re simply a way for utility companies to eliminate jobs and have a minute-by-minute picture of how you use their products.

They’re not there for your health or your convenience!

The Myers Way® Facebook Community is a great place to discuss smart meter dangers with like-minded people who are also concerned about the safety of their home environments.

You can also tell your local, state, and federal representatives that you’re aware of smart meter dangers and don’t want smart meter services.

It’s primarily the government, not individuals, who determine if smart meters are installed.

States have Smart Grid Related Legislation.7 Find out what yours is, and take action.6 Find out what yours is, and take action.

Once you’ve removed your smart meter, the next step is to detoxify your body from RF, EMF, and EMR radiation exposure.

I recommend a glutathione supplement to support your body’s natural detoxification pathways.

Glutathione is your body’s master detoxifier.

No other nutrient works harder to detoxify your body.

Concentrated in your liver, glutathione is your body’s most important molecule when it comes to detoxifying heavy metals and toxins created by radio wave frequencies.

It also helps the body process and eliminate other toxins such as those found in plastics and conventional body products.

When you’re under stress or toxic burden, glutathione is rapidly depleted, so supplementation can be crucial in effectively mediating these challenges. Smart meters emit electromagnetic radiation in the form of radiofrequency radiation, which has been classified as “possibly carcinogenic (cancer-causing) for humans.” Furthermore, there has been no data that shows radiofrequency radiation is safe.

For this reason, it’s important to inform yourself of the dangers of smart meter radiation exposure in your home. Both smart meters and wireless devices emit RF radiation, however it is not uncommon for some smart meters to produce up to 60 times the US safety limit of 1,000 micro-watts per meter squared.

  • That means the radiation from smart meters is equivalent to the output of 160 wireless devices such as cell phones. If you’re wondering how to block smart meter radiation and can’t opt out of having a smart meter, there are RF blocking paints and smart meter guards that you can install to protect your home from smart meter radiation.

  • American Public Power Association. Smart Energy International. Dirty Electricity. Dirty Elecricity. Cassarah Brown. Print Page •Free eBook: 35 Gut Recovery Recipes.

  • SmartMeterDangers.org provides educational and scientific information to the public about health effects and other problems related to wireless smart meters. Best Personal RF Field Meter: Easy to use, small size, affordable; helps measure RF radiation levels so you can avoid high levels.

  • Recommended maximum exposure level for sensitive populations per BioInitiative Report: 0.003 milliwatts per m2*, 10% discount and free shipping worldwide. *BioInitiative Jan. 31, 2012 Report Issues New Warnings on Wireless and EMF Based on 1800 new EMF/RF studies in the past 5 years, a precautionary action level of 0.0003 uW/cm2 to 0.0006 uW/cm2 is suggested to protect sensitive populations, with areduction from the BioInitiative 2007 recommendation of 0.1 uW/cm2 for cumulative outdoor pulsed RFR down to something three orders of magnitude lower (in the low nanowatt per square centimeter range) is justified in 2012 on a public health basis.

  • Smart Meters: Correcting the Gross Misinformation (a published position statement signed by 52 EMF/RF-radiation researchers).

  • From our CEP site:. Join ElectrosmogPrevention.org. “…the inauguration of smart meters with grudging and involuntary exposure of millions to billions of human beings to pulsed microwave radiation should immediately be prohibited…” Olle Johansson, PhD, Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute (Sweden).

  • “…we are creating a potential time bomb. If smart meters are placed on every home, they will contribute significantly to our exposure and this is both unwise and unsafe.“Magda Havas, PhD, Professor of Environmental & Resource Studies, Trent University (Canada).

  • “The SmartGrid concept could require every home to have a wireless electric and gas meter in place of their existing meters.

  • If implemented, it will greatly increase the intensity of new wireless emissions in homes, schools and every other building that uses electricity and gas…. Scientists who study radiofrequency radiation from wireless technologies have issued a scientific statement warning that exposures may be harming the development of children at levels now commonly found in the environment.”(Seletun Scientific Statement PRESS RELEASE).

  • “The Sage Report found many instances where wireless meters will violate FCC public safety limits in the manner they are installed and operated … No positive assertion of safety can be made … Currently, the data made available by the utilities that are installing smart meters is non-existent, piecemeal and without sufficient basis to verify.“ (Sage, Feb.

Is CPUC Insensitive to Electro-Sensitives? EON video w/ 39 moving speakers before the CA Public Utilities Commission on Feb. 24th, 2011, w/ most describing Smart Meter problems. “New calculations suggest that continuous whole-body exposure to electro-magnetic radiation from so-called ‘smart’ meters – which operate around the clock – may be between 50 and 160 times worse [than] that from cell phones.”(EON).

“..the cumulative whole body exposure from a Smart Meter at 3 feet appears to be approximately two orders of magnitude higher than that of a cell phone, rather than two orders of magnitude lower.

” (Hirsch, 1/31/11).

JUST SAY NO TO SMART METERS!

A Project of Center for Electrosmog Prevention.

Tel: (250) 642-2774

Appendix A: Emission Levels of Itron OpenWay® Smart Meter in nW/cm2 (900 MHz Antenna)

Appendix B: RF Emission Level Comparison of Common Household Devices and Smart Meters

Appendix C: Resources and References

Distance

20 cm/8 inches

1 m/3 feet

3 m/10 feet

Common peak exposure levels of a single Itron smart meter

Smart meter, front

Smart meter, back

ca. 1000-10,000

ca. 10-100

outdoorindoor
Sage Report—CALCULATED for 90% duty cycle

1000% reflection

100% reflection

60% reflection

8,904,390

1,294,360

188,390

556,520

18,400

11,770

50,090

1,660

1,060

ACS Compliance Testing Laboratory (RSS-210/FCC15.247)—CALCULATED without reflection factor

900 MHz LAN

2.4 GHz ZigBee

227,000
31,000

[9,000]

[1,000]

Electric Power Research Institute—CALCULATED for upper range of possible RF fields

Peak level

(30 cm/1 foot) 168,360

18,727

1,683

Itron, Inc.—CALCULATED

Centron
Sentinel

68,000
81,000

Richard Tell Associates, Inc.—CALCULATED with ground reflection factor 2.56

Maximum level

adjacent to meter10,000

1000

100

BC Centre for Disease Control—MEASURED* (at British Columbia Hydro Laboratory)

Peak level, front

Min. detectable level of RF Probe

≤ 20,000

≤ 20,000

≤ 20,000

Safe Living Technologies (Ontario)—MEASURED a single smart meter at residence

Peak level, front

Indoor peak level, back

≥ 2,000

10-90

Electric Power Research Institute—MEASURED a single smart meter at residence

Peak level, front

Indoor peak level, back

(30 cm/1 foot) 5,337

1,134

bedroom1 behind meter 61

In bath and bedroom2 55

ET&T (California)—MEASURED a single smart meter at residence

Peak level, front

(30 cm/1 foot) 2,100

British Columbia Hydro—As quoted in its Smart Meter Business Case

< 10,000

10

British Columbia Hydro—CALCULATED AVERAGE based on transmit time per day

0.6% duty cycle (8 min)

0.06% duty cycle (1 min)

2,000

160

[54]

[6]

[6]

[0.7]

© 2011 Katharina Gustavs www.buildingbiology.ca

  • [] Values in square brackets are not listed in the quoted report, but inferred based on the formulas provided.

Emission Level

in nW/cm2

Distance

RF Device/RF GuidelineTypeExposure Duration

> 1,000,000

10 cm*

Cell phone handsetGSMDuring phone call, continuous

600,000

Canada Safety Code 6/FCC900 MHz

450,000

ICNIRP Guidelines (1998)900 MHz

100,000

10 cm*

Cordless phone handsetDECTDuring phone call, continuous

20,000

1 m

Leaky microwave oven2.45 GHzDuring use, continuous

1,000-10,000

1 m

Outdoor

Itron smart meter, front

Peak902-928 MHzIntermittent1 min/day every 30 min

up to 8 min/day every 3-10 s

100-10,000

Varies

Cell phone base stationContinuous exposure

100-10,000

0.5 m

Wi-Fi router, PC card2.4 GHzContinuous exposure

4,250

Swiss Ordinance (2000) 900 MHzCell towers in sensitive areas

2,400

Ukraine Safety Guidelines Radio, TV,Cell towers in sensitive areas

200-2,000

1 m

Cordless phone base stationDECTContinuous exposure

200-2,000

30 cm

RF baby monitorDECTDuring use, continuous

200-2,000

1 m

New microwave oven2.45 GHzDuring use, continuous

10-100

1 m

Indoor

Itron smart meter, back

Peak902-928 MHzIntermittent 1 min/day every 30 min

up to 8 min/day every 3-10 s

50-100

Varies

Health effects observed in populations near cell towers (Kundi 2009)
Cardiac effects, headaches, sleep problems

100

100

Outdoor

Salzburg Resolution (2000)
BioInitiative Report (2007)

> 100

Indoor

“Significant Concern” Building Biology Guidelines for Sleeping Areas (SBM-2008)

17

Seletun Consensus Statement (2010)

10

Indoor

BioInitiative Report (2007)

10

Precautionary reference value for very low radar exposure according to testing specialist Wolfgang Kessel (Germany)Intermittent exposure
Pulse repetition time > 10 s

1-100

Indoor

“Severe Concern” Building Biology Guidelines for Sleeping Areas (SBM-2008)

up to 2.5

Precautionary reference value for low radar exposure according to
Ecolog Institute (Germany)Intermittent exposureEvery ≥ 1 s

1

Outdoor

Salzburg Public Health Department (2002)

≤ 1

Indoor

Largest number of credit points for indoor environment (TQB 2009)Green building rating system(Austria)

0.01-1

Indoor

“Slight Concern” Building Biology Guidelines for Sleeping Areas (SBM-2008)

0.1

Indoor

Salzburg Public Health Department (2002)

< 0.01

Indoor

“No Concern” Building Biology Guidelines for Sleeping Areas (SBM-2008)

0.000 001

0.000 000 001

Natural background (30 MHz-30 GHz): stormy sunNatural background (30 MHz-30 GHz): quiet sun

© 2011 Katharina Gustavs www.buildingbiology.ca

* Near-field exposure from handsets. All listed exposure guidelines apply to far-field exposure situations.

RF Exposure Guidelines for the General Public

USA: FCC Maximum Permissible Exposure at 900 MHz: 6,000,000 µW/m2 or 600 µW/cm2

Canada: Safety Code 6 at 900 MHz: 6,000,000 µW/m2 or 600 µW/cm2

References

British Columbia Centre for Disease Control (Canada)

Assessment of Radio Frequency (RF) Emissions from BC Hydro Smart Meters (2010)
http://www.bccdc.ca/NR/rdonlyres/43EF885D-8211-4BCF-8FA9-0B34076CE364/0/June92011_BCCDCReport_BCHydroSmartMeters.pdf

BC Hydro (utility of British Columbia, Canada)

Understanding Radio Frequency and BC Hydro’s Smart Meters
http://www.bchydro.com/etc/medialib/internet/documents/smi/smi_RadioFrequency_SmartMeters.Par.0001.File.smi-RadioFrequency-SmartMeters.pdf

Smart Metering & Infrastructure Program—Business Case
http://www.bchydro.com/etc/medialib/internet/documents/smi/smi_business_case.Par.0001.File.smi_business_case.pdf

Electric Power Research Institute

An Investigation of Radiofrequency Fields Associated with the Itron Smart Meter (2010)
http://mydocs.epri.com/docs/CorporateDocuments/Newsletters/ENV/QN-2011-02/07-060c.html

Radio-Frequency Exposure Levels from Smart Meters: A Case Study of One Model (2011)
http://www.demandresponsesmartgrid.org/Resources/Documents/Reports-Govt-NFP/EPRI_RF%20Exposure%20from%20Smart%20Meters_Summary%20Report_FEB%202011.pdf

Itron, Inc.

Analysis of Biological Hazards from Exposure to Radio Frequency (RF) Radiation (2007)

Itron White Paper
Wireless Transmissions: An Examination of OpenWay Smart Meter Transmissions in a 24-Hour Duty Cycle (2011) https://www.itron.com/na/PublishedContent/OpenWay%20Wireless%20Transmissions_24%20Hour%20Duty%20Cycle.pdf

OpenWay® Radio Frequency and Safety Compliance
Prepared by Itron, Inc. on behalf of BC Hydro
https://www.itron.com/na/resourcesAndSupport/Documents/OpenWay_Radio_Frequency_and_Safety_Compliance.pdf

Richard Tell Associates, Inc.

An Analysis of Radiofrequency Fields Associated with Operation of the Hydro One Smart Meter System (2010)
http://www.hydroone.com/MyHome/MyAccount/MyMeter/Documents/Smart_Meters_Report_on_RFE.pdf

Sage Associates

Assessment of Radiofrequency Microwave Radiation Emissions from Smart Meters (2010)
http://sagereports.com/smart-meter-rf/

Precautionary Guidelines

BionInitiative Report (2007)
http://www.bioinitiative.org/report/index.htm

Building Biology Evaluation Guidelines for Sleeping Areas (SBM-2008)
http://www.baubiologie.de/downloads/english/richtwerte_2008_englisch.pdf

International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) Guidelines (1998)
http://www.icnirp.de/documents/emfgdl.pdf

Salzburg Public Health Department (Austria 2002)
http://www.salzburg.gv.at/konfliktmanagement_salzburger_modell.pdf

Seletun Consensus Statement (2010)
http://iemfa.org/index.php/publications/seletun-resolution

TQB Green Building Rating System (Austria 2009)
https://www.oegnb.net/tqb.htm

Wolfgang Kessel: Radar – Eine unterschätzte Gefahr. In Elektromagnetische Verträglichkeit Energieversorgung & Mobilfunk. 3rd EMC Conference of the VDB 2004, p. 195.
http://www.baubiologie.net/uploads/media/2004_3._EMV_Themen_Inhalt.pdf

Ecolog Institute http://www.ecolog-institut.de/index.php?id=42
Wolfgang Kessel http://www.cuprotect-shieldingsystems.eu

Legally Binding Safety Standards

Canada Safety Code 6
http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/pubs/radiation/radio_guide-lignes_direct-eng.php

Swiss Ordinance on Protection from Non-Ionizing Radiation (NISV 2000) http://www.bafu.admin.ch/elektrosmog/01100/01101/index.html?lang=de or
http://www.electric-fields.bris.ac.uk/SwissOrdNIR.pdf

Ukraine Health and Safety Standard (1996)
http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/cgi-bin/laws/main.cgi?page=1&nreg=z0488-96

1 BioInitiative Report: A Rationale for a Biologically-based Public Exposure Standard for Electromagnetic Fields (ELF and RF), published August 2007

2 Health Impacts of Radio Frequency Exposure From Smart Meters, April 2011 – Final Report, California Council on Science and Technology (CCST)