React and Next.js are two of the most popular tools amongst front-end web developers. They're fun to work with and responsible for shaping our online experience as the standard tools used to build user interfaces (UI) everywhere.
We'll be looking at Next.js features, how it compares to React, and how it performs as a solid, agile framework for front-end development.
What is React?
Are you a developer or the person in charge of your company's digital strategy? Are you looking to create a landing page, a static website, an e-commerce website, or improve your core web vitals?
This article will show you the benefits and drawbacks of using Next.js along with React's native features and provide some insight into if these tools combined are the right choice to achieve your goals. Next.js: Library vs FrameworkNext.js vs React: What is React?
➤ React Advantages ➤ React DisadvantagesNext.js vs React: What is Next.js? ➤ Features ➤ Next.js Advantages ➤ Next.js DisadvantagesNext.js vs React: How do they compare? ➤ Next.js vs React: Is NextJS better than React? First, we need to draw a fundamental distinction between React and NextJS:.
Differences Between GatsbyJS and NextJS
GatsbyJS vs NextJS: When to Choose Between the Two?
Next.js is a React-based framework that builds server-side rendered apps. React is still the app's foundation, but the structure and navigational mechanisms - the architecture - are defined by Next.js. Why are we comparing Nextjs vs React and not Next.Js vs Create React App (CRA) or any other frameworks then? Next.js has a different approach from CRA. Next.js moves the rendering aspect to the server, so the client doesn't have to process that information.
What is React Native?
This improves performance and SEO because the server pre-renders the pages and then sends the final HTML to the client, resulting in minimal JS, which is is to say less code to load.
Not only can users expect a faster website, but crawlers can also see your website more easily and index it accordingly. Pre-rendering has two different approaches: Static Generation and Server-side rendering (SSR).
Static Generation is and will always be the best performance-wise. Pre-rendering means the page is generated at build time and then be re-used for every request.
In practice, static pages are usually served over a content delivery network (CDN) making it super fast. SSR is preferable under certain circumstances, such as presenting frequently updated dynamic data: the page will be generated over each request and then sent to the client. While SSR is still better than client-render apps, it has a lower performance compared to Static Generation, so it's important to know when to use SSR over Static Generation because otherwise, you won't be able to obtain the benefits of NextJS.
Next.js also allows hassle-free complex structures by using a folder system, making the process more intuitive and simple. On the other hand, CRA builds single-page applications right out of the box, as long you are not concerned about routing.
The main difference between CRA and NextJS is that NextJS will run on the server while CRA will run on the client's browser, which imposes significant changes to your code. Planning to build your software, website or app? But that's about as far these frameworks can be compared. Beyond this point, it's all about the native features of React.Js vs. So we’ll be focusing on what React provides and how Next.js improves its core potential.
What is Next.js?
React is one of the most popular front-end development libraries today, being used along with React Native (another framework) and Redux for enterprise-grade mobile applications. React Hooks is another commonly React-based tool used to handle component behavior and logic.
Next.js vs. React: How do they compare?
React components are easy to use and apply to complex structures because of their declarative nature while maintaining scalability.